<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Safelawns Daily Post and Q&#38;A Blog &#187; The Risks of Pesticides</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.safelawns.org/blog/index.php/tag/the-risks-of-pesticides/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.safelawns.org/blog</link>
	<description>Organic Lawn Care Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:50:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A Call to Action</title>
		<link>http://www.safelawns.org/blog/index.php/2009/06/a-call-to-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safelawns.org/blog/index.php/2009/06/a-call-to-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tukey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Risks of Pesticides]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safelawns.org/blog/index.php/2009/06/a-call-to-action/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the time it was written, a letter from several health care experts to Congressional leaders received little fanfare in the media. Addressed to Senator Edward Kennedy, among others, the letter cited environmental causes of cancer and urged the Obama Administration and Congress to take further action to reduce atmospheric carcinogens.

Now, more than a week [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the time it was written, a letter from several health care experts to Congressional leaders received little fanfare in the media. Addressed to Senator Edward Kennedy, among others, the letter cited environmental causes of cancer and urged the Obama Administration and Congress to take further action to reduce atmospheric carcinogens.</p>
<p><span id="more-57"></span></p>
<p>Now, more than a week later, the letter is getting some notoriety due to its circulation on the Internet. Having been released by a group known as Cambridge Who&#8217;s Who, the letter definitely caught our attention at SafeLawns.org. Some of the causes of cancer listed — phenoxy herbicides (which include 2,4-D) and other pesticides — jump right off the page.</p>
<p>They are highlighted in this letter, below. Share it with everyone you know and contact your own Congressional leaders to get them a copy, too.</p>
<p>The text of the letter follows.</p>
<p>Senator Edward M. Kennedy<br />
Chairman, Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions</p>
<p>Senator Mike Enzi<br />
Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and<br />
Pensions</p>
<p>Senator Daniel K. Inouye<br />
Chairman, Senate Committee on Appropriations</p>
<p>Senator Thad Cochran<br />
Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Appropriations</p>
<p>Representative Henry A. Waxman<br />
Chairman, House Committee on Energy and Commerce</p>
<p>Representative Joe Barton<br />
Ranking Member, House Committee on Energy and Commerce</p>
<p>Representative David Obey<br />
Chairman, House Committee on Appropriations</p>
<p>Representative Jerry Lewis<br />
Ranking Member, House Committee on Appropriations</p>
<p>Dear Senators and Representatives;</p>
<p>President Obama has boldly pledged to reform the national health care<br />
system. Central to this, as the president has stressed, is containing<br />
the spiraling costs of health care &#8212; costs which are soaring at about<br />
6% each year. Most experts agree that this is not possible without a<br />
better plan to prevent Americans from getting cancer in the first<br />
place. This year, 1.5 million people will be diagnosed with cancer. Of<br />
them, 562,000 people &#8211; over 1,500 every day &#8211; will die.</p>
<p>The cancer epidemic strikes as many as one in three Americans and<br />
takes the life of one in four. After 37 years of losing the war<br />
against cancer (a war that President Nixon originally declared in<br />
December 1971), we are taking grossly and demonstrably inadequate<br />
action to protect us from this menace.</p>
<p>While research on the prevention and treatment of cancer is<br />
predominantly the responsibility of the National Cancer Institute<br />
(NCI), other governmental agencies are also involved. These include<br />
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Occupational Safety and<br />
Health Administration (OSHA), the Consumer Product Safety Commission<br />
(CPSC), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Unfortunately,<br />
such action is uncoordinated and unbalanced.</p>
<p>The connection between our losing the cancer war and the need to<br />
control costs through prevention is clear. Cancer is not only one of<br />
the most costly and sometimes deadly diseases in America, it is also<br />
one of the most preventable.</p>
<p>Based on recent estimates by the National Institutes of Health, the<br />
total costs of cancer are $219 billion a year. The annual costs to<br />
taxpayers of diagnosis and treatment amount to $89 billion; the annual<br />
costs of premature death are conservatively estimated at $112 billion;<br />
and the annual costs due to lost productivity are conservatively<br />
estimated at $18 billion. And these are the quantifiable, inflationary<br />
economic costs. The human costs surely are of far greater magnitude.</p>
<p>To be sure, smoking remains the best-known and single largest cause of<br />
cancer, particularly lung cancer. While incidence rates of lung cancer<br />
in men have declined by 20% over the past three decades, rates in<br />
women increased by 111%. But more importantly, non-smoking cancers &#8211;<br />
due to known chemical and physical carcinogens &#8212; have increased<br />
substantially since 1975. Some of the more startling realities in the<br />
failure to prevent cancer are illustrated by their soaring rates of<br />
increase. These include:<br />
o Malignant melanoma of the skin in adults is increasing by 168% due<br />
to the use of sunscreens in childhood that fail to block long wave<br />
ultraviolet light;<br />
o Thyroid cancer is increasing by 124% due in large part to ionizing<br />
radiation;<br />
o Non-Hodgkin&#8217;s lymphoma is increasing 76% due mostly to phenoxy<br />
herbicides; and phenylenediamine hair dyes;<br />
o Testicular cancer is increasing by 49% due to pesticides; hormonal<br />
ingredients in cosmetics and personal care products; and estrogen<br />
residues in meat;<br />
o Childhood leukemia is increasing by 55% due to ionizing radiation;<br />
domestic pesticides; nitrite preservatives in meats, particularly hot<br />
dogs; and parental exposures to occupational carcinogens;<br />
o Ovary cancer (mortality) for women over the age of 65 has increased<br />
by 47% in African American women and 13% in Caucasian women due to<br />
genital use of talc powder;<br />
o Breast cancer is increasing 17% due to a wide range of factors.<br />
These include: birth control pills; estrogen replacement therapy;<br />
toxic hormonal ingredients in cosmetics and personal care products;<br />
diagnostic radiation; and routine premenopausal mammography, with a<br />
cumulative breast dose exposure of up to about five rads over ten<br />
years. Reflecting these concerns, Representatives Debbie Wasserman-<br />
Schultz and Henry Waxman have introduced bills promoting educational<br />
campaigns, including teaching regular breast self examination to high<br />
school students. However, and in spite of its scientifically proven<br />
efficacy, this initiative has been strongly challenged by breast<br />
cancer prevention &#8220;experts&#8221; who remain unaware of the scientific<br />
evidence on the cancer risks of high dose radiation premenopausal<br />
mammography. Furthermore, these &#8220;experts&#8221; are unaware of the well-<br />
documented scientific evidence of avoidable causes of breast cancer,<br />
other than factors related to . . . &#8220;childbirth and breastfeeding.&#8221;<br />
It is now beyond dispute in the independent scientific community that<br />
environmental and occupational exposures to carcinogens are the<br />
primary cause of non-smoking related cancers. An October 2007<br />
publication on environmental and occupational causes of cancer by one<br />
of us (Dr. Richard Clapp) further emphasized that the increasing<br />
incidence of cancer is due to preventable exposures to carcinogens in<br />
the workplace and environment.</p>
<p>The Clapp report provides a wide range of evidence showing preventable<br />
cancers resulting from environmental exposures to formaldehyde,<br />
chlorinated organic pesticides, and organic solvents, among other<br />
substances.</p>
<p>The Clapp report also cites a wealth of evidence attributing the<br />
increasing incidence of lung cancers to preventable occupational<br />
exposures to asbestos, silica, chromium VI, formaldehyde, methylene<br />
chloride, benzene, and ethylene oxide.</p>
<p>The National Cancer Institute is the primary federal agency devoted<br />
exclusively to fighting cancer. Paradoxically, the escalating<br />
incidence of cancer over the last thirty years parallels its sharply<br />
escalating annual budget &#8211; from $690 million in 1975 to $6 billion<br />
this year. Of this a mere $131 million is allocated to NCI&#8217;s mission<br />
on Prevention and Early Detection. Furthermore, President Obama has<br />
proposed a 5% increase in funding the NCI for unspecified cancer<br />
research, with a doubling to $11.5 billion over the next eight years.</p>
<p>However, in spite of well-documented evidence relating the escalating<br />
incidence of cancer to a wide range of avoidable carcinogenic<br />
exposures, the NCI remains &#8220;asleep at the wheel,&#8221; and has stubbornly<br />
refused to devote significant resources or even attention to<br />
prevention.</p>
<p>The NCI has also ignored proddings from Congress and independent<br />
scientific experts to develop a comprehensive registry of carcinogens.<br />
Worse still, the NCI has misled the public by claiming that most<br />
cancers are due to unhealthy behavior, &#8220;blaming the victim,&#8221; despite<br />
overwhelming evidence to the contrary.</p>
<p>NCI officials still claim, for instance that 94% of all cancers are<br />
due to &#8220;unhealthy behavior&#8221; such as smoking, poor nutrition,<br />
inactivity, obesity and over exposure to sunlight &#8211; and that a mere 6%<br />
are attributable to exposures to environmental and occupational<br />
exposures.</p>
<p>These estimates are based on those published in 1981 by the late U.K.<br />
epidemiologist Sir Richard Doll. However, from 1976 to 1999, Doll had<br />
been a closet consultant to U.K. and U.S. industries, including<br />
General Motors, Monsanto and the asbestos industry. Following<br />
revelation of these conflicts of interest, just prior to his death in<br />
2002, Doll admitted that most cancers, other than those related to<br />
smoking and hormones, &#8220;are induced by exposure to chemicals often<br />
environmental.&#8221;</p>
<p>Furthermore, the NCI has touted the imminent success of new cancer<br />
treatments &#8211; promises that have seldom borne out, and which have been<br />
widely questioned by the independent scientific community. For<br />
instance, in 2004, Nobel Laureate Leland Hartwell, President of the<br />
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Control Center, warned that Congress and the<br />
public are paying NCI $4.7 billion a year, most of which is spent on<br />
&#8220;promoting ineffective drugs&#8221; for terminal disease.</p>
<p>As members of the independent scientific community, we welcome the<br />
Obama Administration&#8217;s goal of health care reform and prevention. But<br />
while President Obama has put forward a unique cancer plan, it focuses<br />
far too much on the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, rather than on<br />
prevention. The simple truth is that the more cancer is prevented, the<br />
less there is to treat. That will also save lives and money.</p>
<p>Congress now has an epochal opportunity to reform our health care<br />
system and prevent diseases, particularly cancer, from occurring in<br />
the first place. By taking some simple steps, Congress should enact<br />
reforms to prevent cancer. Accordingly, we recommend that Congress<br />
enact the following specific legislative reforms to the 1971 National<br />
Cancer Act:<br />
o Congress declares that it is the national policy of the United<br />
States to reduce carcinogenic exposures to confirmed or suspected<br />
carcinogens by at least half during the next decade.<br />
o Congress shall create a Deputy Director for Cancer Prevention of the<br />
NCI who, in consultation with the administrators of EPA, OSHA, CPSC,<br />
FDA and other relevant regulatory agencies, shall report to Congress<br />
annually on steps needed during the next decade, under existing<br />
regulatory authority, to reduce, by at least half, exposures<br />
reasonably anticipated to reduce the prevalence of future preventable<br />
cancers.<br />
o The Deputy Director of NCI shall meet quarterly with the<br />
administrators of EPA, OSHA, CPSC, FDA and other relevant regulatory<br />
agencies to identify opportunities to reduce exposures to carcinogens<br />
in the environment, the workplace, pharmaceuticals, and consumer<br />
products &#8212; food, household products, and cosmetics and personal care<br />
products.<br />
o The Deputy Director&#8217;s annual report shall include recommendations<br />
for changes in statutes, regulations and enforcement authority,<br />
necessary to achieve this national policy, in consultation with the<br />
administrators of the EPA, OSHA, CPSC, FDA and other relevant<br />
regulatory agencies.<br />
o Congress shall allocate at least 40% of the NCI budget to explicit<br />
prevention related programs for FY 2011, and 50% by FY 2014.<br />
o Congress shall mandate the annual publication of a comprehensive<br />
register of carcinogens. This will provide federal, state and local<br />
governments, as well as the public, with comprehensive information on<br />
carcinogens in the workplace, environment, and consumer products so<br />
that necessary preventive action can be promptly undertaken.<br />
These steps alone will not win the war against cancer, but they will<br />
be critical in redirecting a failing war on cancer that can best be<br />
described as one of the most notorious public health failures of the<br />
20th century. Cancer prevention is a critical public policy area in<br />
which reform is long overdue.</p>
<p>Experts on Causes and Prevention of Cancer:</p>
<p>Samuel S. Epstein, MD Chairman, Cancer Prevention Coalition<br />
Professor emeritus Environmental &amp; Occupational Medicine<br />
University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health</p>
<p>Nicholas A. Ashford, PhD., JD<br />
Professor of Technology and Policy<br />
Director, MIT Technology and Law Program<br />
Massachusetts Institute of Technology</p>
<p>Richard W. Clapp, DSc, MPH<br />
Professor Environmental Health<br />
Boston University School of Public Health</p>
<p>Quentin D. Young, MD<br />
Past President American Public Health Association<br />
Chairman, Health and Medicine Policy Research Group, Chicago</p>
<p>CONTACT:<br />
Samuel S. Epstein, MD<br />
Chairman, Cancer Prevention Coalition<br />
Professor emeritus Environmental &amp; Occupational Medicine<br />
University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health<br />
Tel: 312-996-2297 Email: epstein@uic.edu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safelawns.org/blog/index.php/2009/06/a-call-to-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

