<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Safelawns Daily Post and Q&#38;A Blog &#187; Pesticide Bylaws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.safelawns.org/blog/index.php/tag/pesticide-bylaws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.safelawns.org/blog</link>
	<description>Organic Lawn Care Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:49:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is a Weak Law Better Than No Law At All?</title>
		<link>http://www.safelawns.org/blog/index.php/2009/12/is-a-weak-law-better-than-no-law-at-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safelawns.org/blog/index.php/2009/12/is-a-weak-law-better-than-no-law-at-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tukey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pesticide Bylaws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safelawns.org/blog/index.php/2009/12/is-a-weak-law-better-than-no-law-at-all/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a move that stunned many activists, the city  council of Calgary, Alberta, voted NOT to ban lawn and garden pesticides — thereby not joining much of the rest of the nation of Canada in banning products like weed &#8216;n feed and Roundup.
The councilors&#8217; rationale is that the city wouldn&#8217;t have the resources to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a move that stunned many activists, the city  council of Calgary, Alberta, voted NOT to ban lawn and garden pesticides — thereby not joining much of the rest of the nation of Canada in banning products like weed &#8216;n feed and Roundup.</p>
<p>The councilors&#8217; rationale is that the city wouldn&#8217;t have the resources to police the ban if it were enforced. So therefore the council did nothing. </p>
<p>Not that Calgary is any of my business, I guess, but I think the council misses the point here. The fact is that a law, any law, won&#8217;t stop EVERYONE from breaking that law, but it will stop most people. If a bylaw banning pesticides had been passed, it&#8217;s fair to say that pesticide use would have been reduced by, say, 98 percent. </p>
<p>In Hudson, Quebec, where the first-ever ban on pesticides was enacted in 1991, the town has never fined anyone for pesticide abuse. Everyone knows a few people in town who are breaking the law, but the residents generally take comfort in the fact that their town is virtually pesticide free. </p>
<p>Calgary&#8217;s action is akin to taking down speed limits — just because not everyone obeys them. </p>
<p>It was just a bad decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safelawns.org/blog/index.php/2009/12/is-a-weak-law-better-than-no-law-at-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hudson Mayor Re-Elected</title>
		<link>http://www.safelawns.org/blog/index.php/2009/10/hudson-mayor-re-elected/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safelawns.org/blog/index.php/2009/10/hudson-mayor-re-elected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tukey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pesticide Bylaws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safelawns.org/blog/index.php/2009/10/hudson-mayor-re-elected/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Euphoric phone calls and emails poured out of Hudson, Quebec, this past week with word that Michael Elliott — the same man who shepherded North America&#8217;s first anti-pesticide bylaw all the way to the Supreme Court — was named mayor again after 16 years in retirement from town politics. 
Elliott, who is a key figure [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Euphoric phone calls and emails poured out of Hudson, Quebec, this past week with word that <a href="http://www.pfzmedia.com/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=article&#038;id=46&#038;Itemid=83">Michael Elliott</a> — the same man who shepherded North America&#8217;s first anti-pesticide bylaw all the way to the Supreme Court — was named mayor again after 16 years in retirement from town politics. </p>
<p>Elliott, who is a key figure in the documentary film, <a href="http://www.pfzmedia.com">A Chemical Reaction</a>, had hinted to us that he was considering running for the town&#8217;s top elected office. The filming of the movie, he said, made him realize he &#8220;had a lot of unfinished business.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ultimately, when Elliott announced he was running, no one else in the town of 5,200 stepped forward to oppose him. He earned the seat by acclimation. </p>
<p>That sets up an intriguing battle. The town&#8217;s three golf courses have been exempted from the town&#8217;s historic anti-pesticide bylaw that took effect in 1991 and many folks, Elliott included, have objected to the courses&#8217; free ride with pesticides. Will the new/old sheriff take on this fight to make history a second time around? I wouldn&#8217;t bet against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safelawns.org/blog/index.php/2009/10/hudson-mayor-re-elected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
