You Are Here: Home » Blog » General » New Hampshire May Be Poised to Make a Major Anti-Pesticide Splash, or Maybe Not

New Hampshire May Be Poised to Make a Major Anti-Pesticide Splash, or Maybe Not


Business has been good during June at the Manchester, N.H., airport, at least on the flights leading to and from Washington, D.C. With that state’s legislature considering bills this month affecting both bio-engineered crops AND lawn and garden pesticides, many of the chemical industry’s finest suits have been frequenting the hallways of the statehouse in Concord on Tuesdays with a singular message: “Business as usual is working, so don’t let these fringe environmentalists sway your vote.”

I attended a committee hearing Tuesday afternoon, June 22, at the request of Rep. Suzanne Smith, the sponsor of bill HB 1456, as well as the LEAH Collective, an upstart environmental group that has done a remarkably good job of making a lot of productive noise in New Hampshire since its inception in February.

HB 1456 enacted law that formed a committee to study “the use of pesticides, herbicides, and their alternatives in residential neighborhoods, school properties, playgrounds, and other places children congregate.” And though it’s just a study bill, the nation’s leading pesticide salesmen want to make sure the committee gets all the “right” facts during its hearings each Tuesday afternoon in June.

The lineup of pesticide “experts” was prodigious. The way they deliver their well-rehearsed lines would seemingly make their act run as smoothly as a long-running Broadway show. Here are just a few of the zingers:

From Bayer Crop Science: “We know more about pesticides than any other classification of industrial chemicals. If something is found not to be safe, it is taken off the market. At this point, all the dangerous pesticides have been removed.”

Even if you take this statement to be accurate, the inherent flaw in the system is obvious. Only when something is found to be dangerous is it then taken off the market. Bayer and the others stressed over and over that the Environmental Protection Agency provides a “rigorous” 10-year risk assessment analysis of each chemical approved for use and yet Jeremiah Duncan, a chemist from Plymouth State University, testified that while he worked at the EPA, the budget cuts were so severe under the Bush administration that the EPA closed its library and carted away the documents necessary to make a risk assessment in the first place.

And another from Bayer: “When pesticides break down in the environment, we carefully study the metabolites (byproducts) just as rigidly as we study the primary compounds and if these metabolites are proven to be toxic, we don’t use them.”

Recently, the General Accounting Office of Congress noted that the EPA was at least a full decade behind in its mandated assessments of pesticide compounds. The EPA does not, in any substantive measure, evaluate metabolites of toxic compounds. When these breakdown products are studied by independent laboratories, they are often found to be far more toxic than the primary pesticide.

From Scott Miracle Gro’s Director of Environmental Stewardship, Chris Wible: “It’s our goal to create a safe, healthy environment for children.”

As soon as Mr. Wible offered that party line, I asked the committee chair for permission to address him directly. “How does killing a dandelion, a clover plant or a piece of plantain create a safe environment for children?” I asked.

Without skipping a beat, he calmly explained that dandelions, clover and other weeds attracted bees, and therefore you don’t want those plants around. “My daughter, who is allergic to bees, ought to have the same right to play on the school fields without fear of being stung,” he said. “And the school nurse does not allow her to bring the EpiPen onto the field; she keeps it all the way in her office.”

I honestly thought the pathologist sitting next to me was going to fall out of his chair on that one. Dr. Jerome Silbert was in town from Connecticut, where he was instrumental in helping to pass the historic Connecticut law banning pesticides around schools in 2005.

“They should fire the nurse,” he said aloud.

Lasting little more than two hours, the unusually informal hearing was at once curious, humorous, inspiring, frustrating and at times outright maddening. Remarkably civil for the most part, the seating pattern literally pitted environmental activists shoulder-to-shoulder and chair to chair with chemical lobbyists whom they not-so-secretly loathe, and visa versa. I, for one, was delighted to be seated way down one side of the table from Jim Campanella, the outspoken owner of the LawnDawg company of Nashua, N.H., who smugly announced during the pre-hearing introductions that he was there “on behalf of his 15,000 customers who wanted a nice lawn.” I’ve never had a real conversation with the man, but I’ve been told many stories about how he vehemently scoffs at the growing body of pesticide toxicity evidence and thinks only of improving his company’s bottom line. When I heard him openly declare in February that “we are the true environmentalists,” I witnessed his delusion first hand.

It’s tough to sit there and listen to people tell outright lies at worst or, at best, bend the hell out of the truth. The primary intent of Rep. Smith’s bill is to look at removing weed killers from lawns, much like lawmakers have done in Canada. She would like to, at a minimum, consider a school pesticide bill like the ones enacted in Connecticut and New York. On Tuesday, the pesticide lobbyists constantly tried to instill fear in the minds of the New Hampshire committee, however, by talking about everything from termites and ticks, to Eastern equine encephalitis and just about every other insect-borne disease. No one on our side is talking about removing pesticides absolutely necessary when a public health issue is involved, but the chemical industry will literally say anything to confuse, distort and muddy the issue.

I left there feeling incredibly sorry for the committee members, all of whom who are basically unpaid volunteers struggling to sort through fact and the high, smelly piles of fiction. I left there feeling disgusted that the votes for and against doing something seem to be literally following party lines; the Democrats come talk to me, Dr. Silbert and the folks from LEAH afterward and the Republicans canoodle in the aisles with Scotts Miracle Gro, Bayer Crop Science and the master spin doctors themselves, the paid shills of The Responsible Industry for a Sound Environment.

It’s tough to read how this will go. It may well be that, if no compromise can be reached, the lobbyists will lift a toast on that last flight back to Washington — content in business as usual in New Hampshire for a while longer. The Democrat lawmakers in the room really want this process to lead to something and they implored us to find common ground where synthetic and chemical and organic approaches can peacefully co-exist.

But if you’ve ever looked at soil life under a microscope you know that the two are like the oil and water flowing through the Gulf right now. Soil microbes can’t survive in an environment polluted by chemical fertilizers and pesticides, anymore than the fish and crustaceans can make it off the northern Florida coast . . . so what are we supposed to do? A compromise is tough.

And besides, it’s not easy to work with a man who would have us be rid of all bees anywhere children might congregate. But if you’d like to pass your condolences for his daughter’s condition along to Chris Wible at Scotts, his email is [email protected]

Or, better still, come to New Hampshire and meet him in person next Tuesday afternoon. If you have an extra EpiPen to share, I’m sure he’d appreciate the gesture.

About The Author

Paul Tukey

An international leader of the green movement, Mr. Tukey is a journalist, author, filmmaker, TV host, activist and award-winning public speaker, who is widely recognized as North America's leading advocate for landscape sustainability and toxic pesticide reduction strategies.

Number of Entries : 1023
  • Jeremy

    The chances of dying from a bee sting are 1:15,000,000.
    The chances that 2,4-D (a component of Scott’s products) affects the nervous system are 1:1

    Mr. Wible’s child has every right not to play in fear. My child should have the same right.

  • Fred Roderick

    Estimates of deaths due to bee stings are about 40-50 per year in the United States and about one half of one percent of children, which is a very large number, do have severe reactions to bee stings. None of that can be taken lightly and shame on the parent who doesn’t speak to the school nurse about his or her child’s condition.

    But the potential for harm to children from pesticides is 100 PERCENT! The bee argument didn’t hold 40 years ago when the chemical industry used it to convince mothers that clover was, in fact, a weed even though it was contained in most of Scotts seed mixes until about 1970. It’s pathetic to think that Scotts’ lead “environmental steward” is still using that argument today. Absolutely pathetic. It should outrage people.

    Thank you, Paul, for your peek inside that hearing room. God bless you for the important work you do.

    Fred Roderick

  • K. B.

    Great report from the front lines. Thank you for being there and doing what you do.

  • scotsman

    It is hilarious how RISE and the chemical peddlers exaggerate to create monsters out of ants, bed bugs, mosquitoes and bees. Their talking points are well rehearsed, and of course, highly overblown. Are they seriously so out so of touch and afraid of nature that they think they must completely sanitize it. Sadly, the new Husqvarna commercial probably portrays accurately the outlook of many homeowners: that unless every weekend they open the garage and go to war with nature with all the mechanical attachments and synthetic nature fighters they can get, nature will take over their yard and home, and will be like the history channel series “after humans”. It is sad that this fear has been gradually established over the last 60 years in American suburban culture with so many. I suggest that we get back in touch with God’s green earth, and stop fighting it so much.

  • Alyssa Owens

    If these synthetic cosmetic lawn products are safe, why are they not used in over 3/4 of Canada? Why do countries in Europe not use them for lawncare? If these unnecessary lawn products are safe, why do I feel sick when surrounded by them but “healthy” when I am away from the source? Let’s talk about endocrine disruption. Where are our doctors? Why are Canadian doctors not afraid to speak up?

  • Sandra

    In thinking over the bee argument I’ve come to the conclusion that Mr. Wible is absolutely right. His child does have the right to play in the same safety that all other children do. (I’m regretful that he feels the need to bring his own child into a public debate to prove a point and I’m fairly certain his own father would not approve either.)

    However, in his defense of children who are allergic to bees he brings up a very good point that the school nurse should be contacted. There is no excuse for her/him to not allow his child’s EpiPen to be at arms length at all times. Just because there is no clover, dandelion or plantain on the site does NOT mean that there are no bees. Since bees are flying insects they can literally end up anywhere at anytime during the normal course of their business. I’m not even certain that areas with dandelions have a lot more bees than areas where herbicides have killed the dandelions.

    I am asking anybody who knows where Mr. Wible’s children attend school to make that information public on this board. (Since Mr. Wible already brought his family into the argument I’m sure he won’t mind.) I will personally, write a letter, to that nurse to state that it is my opinion, as a nurse myself, that she is endangering the lives of her students with special needs. I will copy her principal, the school board and the superintendent of schools in the town in which he lives.

    I will check back often for this information to be posted.

Scroll to top